Go As Hard As You Can for As Long As You Can (Quick Comment, Parashat Va-ethanan)

ואתחנן”…And he (Moses) pleaded (Deuteronomy 3:23).

The word appears only once in the Bible and refers to Moses final plea — (after already having been told, “No!) that God allow him to enter the Promised Land. This time God answers sharply and tells Moses effectively, The answer remains “No!” And don’t bring this up again!

What does this teach us?

We all have dreams that will remain unfulfilled. No matter who we are there will always be something we wish we could have done that we did not!

It is as though God tells us what a soccer coach says to his starting players: “Go as hard as you can for as long as you can, and I’ll know–not you–when it’s time to take you out of the game!”

Is that REALLY the way God works? I do not know for sure. None of us does.

But I believe

 I believe that a single, good and caring God wants to take responsibility to combat the injustice, hunger, homelessness, violence, disease and environmental neglect that plague our world.

Am I sure of this? No, I am not.

But I do know that if we act כאלו “as if” there is a God who wants us to do these things, we would have a much better world than we have now.

 Moses, the “servant of the Eternal One” (Deuteronomy 34:5) is the Torah’s foremost example of one who lived as God wished. Despite Moses, pleadings, God took him “out of the game” before he was ready. We, like Moses, should “go as hard as we can for as long as we can” to make the world better. But we should realize that God may decide at any time to take us “out of the game.”

Blame the Media for the Violence Choking Our Society? For Sure!

Now it’s a theater in Louisiana! Fewer and fewer days pass between headlines reporting another wanton act of violence. The fuel for these incidents is no mystery.

Frequent and graphic depictions of violence in movies, television shows and video games increases seemingly by the day. For years now in op Ed essays, sermons, talks in schools and appearances on TV news shows I have railed against this trend.

As I pursue this campaign I feel like the solitary man of Jewish legend who visited the biblical cities of Sodom and Gomorrah each day to urge the people to repent and change their wicked ways. “Why do you bother?” a friend asked him. Don’t you know those people will never change and become like you?

“Perhaps not,” the man answered, “but I must keep proclaiming my message, so that, I do not become like them!”

On the Ninth of Av, the Hebrew calendar date associated with numerous tragedies in history, we must now add to the list of those calamities we remember, the shootings at Hartford’s West Indian Day parade in 2008.

Why can we only expect the violence to increase? Statistics show that the average 11-year old has witnessed 8,000 TV murders. The acts of violence in movies and video games are mind numbingly gruesome. As study after study shows they desensitize kids to the impact of violence, and kids imitate what they see in the media.

I am an example, and I do not write this with pride.

As a nine-year-old kid I watched my TV cowboy heroes sneak up behind preoccupied bad guys, extract revolvers from their holsters and tell them, “Hold it right there!”

I thought that was so cool that I tried it myself on the cop who stood on the corner near my elementary school. Fortunately my exploit did not end tragically.

Today the violence available on TV is 100 times more graphic than when I was nine, and there are hundreds more TV stations for kids to watch. Throw in the movies and video games, and the events that grab—and will continue to grab—such horrific national and local headlines should not surprise us.

In video games the kid becomes not just the consumer of violence but also the perpetrator of it. In these games there are no moral consequences for these actions. Indeed the ability to commit unspeakable acts of violence is one of the most important skills necessary to succeed in so many of these games.

Of course parents should be the first and strongest line of defense. But society has a stake in this problem too.

The media will not become interested until it is in their economic interest to do so. They need to hear us demand that they tone down the violence or we will turn of our sets and not buy their games. Otherwise, as one producer told me, asking media outlets to eliminate violence from their programming is the same as asking Exxon not to sell gasoline.

We should also hold advertisers responsible for programs they sponsor. We must let them know that we shall choose not to buy products that advertise shows with graphically violent content.

When I implored former Congressman Henry Waxman, who represented LA’s Hollywood district at a conference once to use his influence to persuade the media industry to tone down the violence for the sake of our children’s lives and safety, he replied disinterestedly, “We can’t impose censorship.”

I do not ask for censorship, but I do ask for self-discipline both by the consumers and producers of violence. There can be little doubt that a serious reduction of media mayhem will result in a serious reduction of violent crime in our streets. For the sake of our children and grandchildren it is time that we the people take media violence seriously and demand that parents, politicians and the perpetrators of media violence all address this vital issue.

… Lass es mit mir beginnen!   Kurzkommentar: Wochenabschnitt Devarim (Deuteronomium 1,1 – 3.22)

“Das sind die Worte”, beginnt das Buch Deuteronomium. Die “Worte” rekapitulieren die Bewährungsproben, Leiden und Triumphe der Kinder Israels in der Wüste. Es sind Abschiedsreden des Mose an sein Volk bevor er die Herrschaft abgibt.

Wenn wir das Buch durchlesen, finden wir in Details Abweichungen zu vorherigen Beschreibungen der Ereignisse.

 Zum Beispiel, findet in Exodus 18 Jethro Moses an Rande des Burnout vor. Jethro sagt ihm, dass er Verantwortung delegieren und weitere Führungsebenen im Volk etablieren muss. Er sagt praktisch: “Lass andere die kleinen Probleme lösen, kümmere du dich nur um die wirklich großen Probleme.” Jethro’s Initiative bewahrte die Kinder Israels vor dem Zusammenbruch unter der drückenden Leitungsaufgabe, das Volk Israel durch die Wüste zu führen.

Aber im Deuteronomium, wird Jethro gar nicht erwähnt. Es ist allein die Idee des Mose.

Ich weiß, dass Menschen Geschichte oft verschieden wahrnehmen.

Seit mehr als elf Jahren bin ich im Schlagabtausch mit einem prominenten palestinensischen Verteidiger, sowohl in in persönlichen Begegnungen wie im Internet. Unsere Sichtweisen der Geschichte sind sehr verschieden.

Nach elf Jahren und hunderten von E-mails reden wir immer noch aneinander vorbei.

Wir sind genau da, wo wir angefangen haben: zwei intelligente Menschen, die von Übereinstimmung so weit entfernt sind, wie am ersten Tag.

 Vielleicht wäre es besser, wir würden weniger debattieren, sondern unsere unterschiedlichen geschichtlichen Sichtweisen anerkennen. Ich will es versuchen.

Wird es etwas verändern? Ich weiß es nicht, aber Jill Jackson Miller’s Lied gibt den Rat “Lass auf Erden Frieden werden und lass es mit mir beginnen.”

Geschichte hat oft viele Versionen. Wir erhöhen die Chancen eine gerechtere, fürsorglichere und mitfühlende Welt zu schaffen, wenn wir gewillt sind mit Einfühlung auf die Geschichte zu hören, die nicht unsere ist.

Translation: with gratitude to Pastor Ursula Sieg

“… Let it Begin with Me!” Quick Comment: Parashat Devarim (Deuteronomy 1:1 – 3:22)  

”“These are the words,” begins the Book of Deuteronomy. The “words” recap the trials, tribulations and triumphs of the Children of Israel in the wilderness. It is a set of farewell speeches by Moses to his people before he relinquishes the reigns of leadership.

As we read through the book we see discrepancies in details of previously described events.

For examples, in Exodus 18 Jethro sees Moses on the verge of burn out. Jethro tells him that he needs to delegate responsibility and set up levels of leadership among the people. He essentially says, “Let others decide the little problems and you just worry about the really big ones.”

Jethro’s initiative saved Moses and the Children of Israel from collapsing under the administrative burdens of leading a large people through the wilderness. But in Deuteronomy, Jethro gets no credit. The idea is Moses’ alone.

I know that people often see history differently.

For more than eleven years I have been jousting both in person and online with a prominent Palestinian advocate. Our views of history are very different, Eleven years and hundreds of emails later we are still talking past each other.

We are exactly where we started: two intelligent people no closer to agreement than on the day we met.

Perhaps it would be better if we debated less and affirmed each other’s historical view more. I will try.

Will anything change? I do not know, but Jill Jackson Miller’s famous song advises, ”Let there be peace on earth and let it begin with me.”

History often has many versions. We improve our chances of creating a more just, caring and compassionate world if we are willing to listen with empathy to those not our own.

How Should Reform Jews Observe Tishah B’Av? (published on URJ.ORG)

BY RABBI STEPHEN LEWIS FUCHS , 7/20/2015

I had never even heard of Tishah B’Av until I was 12 years old and participating in the inaugural season of the Camp Institute for Living Judaism (later to renamed URJ Eisner Camp) in Great Barrington, MA. Since then, I have struggled with the significance of this day for me as a Reform Jew.

On Tishah B’Av, traditionally observant Jews fast in memory of the two magnificent Temples of Jerusalem destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE and the Romans in 70 CE. The day also commemorates other historical tragedies. For example, it is said that the beginning of the first Crusade in 1095, a time of persecution and slaughter of the Jews of Europe and in 1290 the expulsion of Jews from England both took place on that date. Tishah B’Av also coincides with the expulsion of Jews from Spain in 1492 and the outbreak of World War I in 1914.

The destruction of the two Temples and the exile of Jews from our sacred land that followed were occasions of death and suffering, so sorrow is an appropriate means of commemoration. Certainly, all the other historical tragedies associated with that date are important to remember, too.

On the other hand, the destruction of the Temple ended the control of a hereditary priestly class over Jewish life and ended animal sacrifice as our chief way of communicating with God. Today, only ultra-Orthodox Jews would like to see the restoration of the Temple and the practices associated with it.

How can we reconcile the remembrance of genuine tragedy with the growth and development of the Judaism that the destruction of the Temple made possible?

I observe a fast on Tishah B’Av until midday, when I study the traditional text for the day, the biblical Book of Lamentations. Then, at 1:00 p.m., I partake of a midday meal in which I express gratitude for the Judaism that has been bequeathed to us over the years, a Judaism that no longer slaughters animals and sprinkles their blood as a sign of gratitude or as a petition to God. I celebrate the fact that a Judaism without the Temple and its hereditary priestly class has been replaced by a Judaism that, through study, prayers and acts of kindness, calls on each of us in our own way to make the world a better place.

Tishah B’Av, for me, is also the day when I begin preparing for the period of introspection culminating in the rituals of Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur. Impetus for beginning the process of repentance comes from the middle of the book of Lamentations: “Let us search and examine our ways and return to the Eternal One!” (Lamentations 3:40)

For Reform Jews, Tishah B’Av can be both a day of mourning and a day of joy. We mourn for the destruction of the Temple, but we rejoice that we have developed strong and resilient ways to thrive as Jews. Mourning the tragedies of the past we let us search and examine our way forward and face the future with hope and courage!
About the Author
Rabbi Stephen Lewis Fuchs is the author of What’s in It for Me? Finding Ourselves in Biblical Narratives. He is the former president of the World Union for Progressive Judaism and rabbi emeritus of Congregation Beth Israel in West Hartford, CT.

View all posts by Rabbi Stephen Lewis Fuchs
Published: 7/20/2015
CATEGORIES: Jewish Holidays, Tishah B’Av

” … And No Religion Too!” Really John Lennon?

It’s surely unwise to start an essay that you hope will sway people’s thinking by denigrating a song millions love, but I have to say it: I detest John Lennon’s iconic, Imagine. Not only do I find the melody insipid, but the lyric “And no religion too,” punctures my soul.

Oh yes, I have heard how many problems religion causes -–all the wars, and all the destruction.

And lately Bill Maher has weighed in on the question, saying:

“When I hear from people that religion doesn’t hurt anything, I say, ‘Really?’ Well besides wars, the Crusades, the Inquisitions, 9/11, the suppression of women, the suppression of homosexuals, fatwas, honor killings, suicide bombings, arranged marriages to minors, human sacrifice, burning witches, and systematic sex with children, I have a few quibbles.”

To Mr Maher and Mr Lennon, I respond as follows:

Of course religion has caused great harm. Different religious expressions have perpetrated all of the horrors, Mr. Maher, that you note!

The problem is not with religion itself but with the distortion of religious ideals. Those wars result from our inability to accept that well-meaning people can view religious questions and practices differently. We do not need to do away with religion. We need to do away with our compulsion to force OUR religion on others. We need to learn to not only tolerate, but to respect and affirm religious diversity.

No doubt there are many thorns in the rose garden of religion, and many have felt the sting of those thorns. But on balance, we are far better off with religion than without it.

Without religion humanity would never have perceived that life has purpose and meaning and that we are each called in our own way to treat others with dignity and respect and to use our talents to create a more just, caring and compassionate society.

Without religion no one would have ever felt the call of a good, caring God, to feed, the poor, clothe the naked and house the homeless. Of course many people today do not believe in God but still do wonderfully positive things. But would they have ever discovered the impulse to do those things had people long ago not done them because they felt God commanded them to?

I doubt it.

Religion is like fire, the automobile, the internet and many other things we can name. All of these can be horribly destructive, but I would not want to Imagine the world without them.

 

 

Wir müssen mehr zuhören! Kurzkommentar zum Wochenabschnitt Mattot (Numeri 30,2 – 32,42)

Der griechische Philosoph Epitctet (55 – 135 d.Z.) lehrte: Wir haben zwei Ohren und einen Mund, damit wir doppelt sie viel zuhören wie wir reden.

 Moses hätte diesen Rat befolgen sollen:

Als die Stämme Ruben und Gad fragten, ob sie auf der Ostseite des Jordan siedeln dürften, weil das fruchtbare Grasland für das Vieh sehr nützlich wäre, geriet Mose in Rage, unterbrach sie und sagte: “Wie könnt ihr eure Landsleute in den Krieg ziehen lassen und ihr haltet euch in sicherer Entfernung aus dem Kampf heraus?”

Erst nach langem Geschimpfe hörte er sie sagen. “Wir wollen als Stoßtrupp an der Spitze des Heeres gehen. Erst wenn das Land besetzt ist und Frieden hat, wollen wir zurückkehren in unser Gebiet auf dieser Seite.” Als das Missverständnis aufgeklärt war, stimmten Mose und Gott dem Wunsch der Stämme zu. (Numeri 32, 2-10

Unsere Weisen lehrten, dass die Verbannung aus Jerusalem und die Zerstörung des Tempels (70 d.Z.) nicht durch die Römer herbeigeführt worden war, sondern durch “grundlosen Hass” zwischen Juden.

Mehr zuhören und weniger reden hätte die jüdische Gesellschaft zu römischen Zeiten vielleicht bewahrt. Mehr zuhören könnte heute die israelische Gesellschaft bewahren, wenn die Frage brennt: Wer ist ein Jude?

Ultra-orthodoxe Autoritäten erklären regelmäßig, dass nicht-orthodoxe Juden nicht wirklich Juden seien. Aber nicht-orthodoxe Juden stellen die große Mehrheit der Juden Nord Amerikas. Ohne nicht-orthodoxe Unterstützung würde Israel nicht überleben.

Orthodoxe und nicht-orthodoxe Juden können durch konstruktive Gespräche viel gewinnen und viel verlieren, wenn sie sie vermeiden.

Hoffentlich werden wir lernen, einander zuzuhören, voneinander zu lernen, unsere Unterschiede als Juden zu akzeptieren und sie beiseite zu legen, wenn es darum geht für ein bessere Welt für alle Kinder Gottes zu arbeiten.

Translation: with thanks to Pastor Ursula Sieg

A Living Torah! Quick Comment: Parashat Massey (Numbers 33:1-36:13)

The Book of Numbers ends with a modification to the ruling that Zelophehad’s daughters could inherit their father’s property (Numbers 27).

The tribesmen of Zelophehad appeal the ruling saying if the daughters marry outside the tribe, the tribe’s holdings would diminish.

God and Moses uphold the appeal and rule that Zelophehad’s daughters are free to marry whom they wish but only within their tribe of Manasseh (Numbers 36:12).

Without diminishing the enormous gain for women’s rights that the original ruling represented, the appeal verdict maintains tribal integrity (perhaps not important to us but certainly important then).

As it turns out Zelophehad’s daughters victory opened the door to the expansion of women’s rights in subsequent Jewish law, a process that the rabbis of the Mishnah (200BCE – 200CE) pursued enthusiastically.

By the first pre Christian century Jewish law instituted the Ketubah, a contract, as the basis for marriage. It’s most important provision was a lien on the husband’s property for a substantial sum to be paid to the wife if he divorced his wife or if he died (Babylonian Talmud, Ketubot 82b).

Although technically a woman could not divorce her husband, the rabbis approved a broad array of circumstances under which a woman could take her husband to court, which would force the husband to divorce and pay his wife the value of her Ketubah. These circumstances included changing jobs or location without his wife’s consent, (Babylonian Talmud, 52b, 110b; Mishnah Ketubot 13:10) and refusing to try to meet her sexual needs, (Mishnah, Ketubot 5:6).

The final words of the Book of Numbers testify that the Torah must prudently adapt to changing realities while maintaining Torah’s sanctity. The Rabbis of the Talmud and MIshnah were up to that challenge. Are we?

We Need to Listen More — Quick Comment Parashat Mattot (Numbers 30:2-32:42)

The Greek philosopher Epictetus (55 CE -135) taught: “We have two ears and one mouth so that we will listen twice as much as we speak.”

Moses might have heeded this advice.

When the tribes of Reuben and Gad asked to settle on the east side of the Jordan to avail themselves of the fertile grazing land for their cattle, Moses flew into a rage and interrupted them saying, “How can you let your kinsmen go to war while you remain safe outside of the fray?

Only after a long angry rant did he hear them say:

“We will go as shock troops at the head of he invasion. Only when the land is settled and at peace will we return to our holdings on this side of the Jordan.” With the misunderstanding cleared up Moses and God consented to the tribes’ request. (Numbers 32:2-20)

Our Sages taught that the exile from Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple (70 CE) came about not because of Roman might but because of “baseless hatred” among Jews.

More listening and less talking might have saved Judaean society in Roman times. More listening might save Israeli society today where the question burns? Who is a Jew?

Ultra-Orthodox authorities frequently declare that non-Orthodox Jews are not really Jews. Yet non-Orthodox Jews are the vast majority of the North American Jewish world. Without non-Orthodox Jewish support Israel could not survive.

Orthodox and non-Orthodox Jews have much to gain from constructive conversation and much to lose by avoiding it.

Hopefully we will learn to listen to one another, learn from one another, accept our differences as Jews, and put them aside when it comes time to work for a better world for all of God’s children.

 

For My German Readers: Korachs Kinder Kurzkommentar zum Tora-Abschnitt Pinchas (Nummeri 25, 10 – 30,1)

“Die Söhne Korachs starben nicht.” (Nummeri 26,11) Obwohl ihr Vater viele zu schwerer Sünde verleitete und Gott ihn entsprechend bestrafte, machte Gott Korachs Söhne nicht verantwortlich.

“Die Söhne Korachs starben nicht”, ist eine Metapher dafür, warum meine Frau Vickie und ich letztes Jahr zehn Wochen in Deutschland verbracht haben und werden es mit Eifer in diesem Herbst wieder tun.

Einer der beeindruckendsten Momente unserer Reise war, als unsere Gastgeber Pastor Martin Pommerening und Pastorin Ursula Sieg und ich Exodus 34,6-7 studierten. Der Abschnitt lehrt, dass Gottes Liebe und Güte bis in die tausendste Generation reichen, aber Gottes Ärger nur bis in die dritte Generation.

Jeder von uns predigte am nächsten Tag in einer Lutherischen Kirche über diesen Text und wir lernen alle voneinander.

Für mich ist der entscheidende Punkt des Abschnittes die große Differenz zwischen den Tausend und den Vier – zwischen Gottes Fähigkeit zu Liebe und Güte im Gegensatz zu seiner weniger ausgeprägten Fähigkeit zu Ärger und Strafe.

Es gibt einige biblische Beispiele (Deuteronomium 24,16; Jeremia 31,28-29; Hesekiel 18,19-20), die betonen, dass Kinder nicht verantwortlich gemacht werden dürfen für die Vergehen ihrer Eltern.

“Die Söhne Korachs starben nicht”, ist vielleicht das herausragendste Beispiel für diese wichtige Lehre.

Ich zitterte als ich in der Michaeliskirche sprach, weil es in dieser Kirche einen Pastor gab, Ernst Biberstein, der aus der Kirche austrat, um als Nazi ein Oberkommando zu übernehmen. In den Nürnberger Prozessen wurde er wegen des Mordes an tausenden Juden verurteilt.

Ich rief dem Geist Bibersteins zu: “Du wirst weiter in der Hölle verrotten, aber wir Juden sind immer noch hier!”

Dann sah ich Tränen bei vielen der Gottesdienstbesucher, als ich sagte:

“Ihr seid nicht verantwortlich für das, was dieser Mann tat. Wir können die Vergangenheit nicht ändern, aber die Zukunft gehört uns, um sie gemeinsam zu gestalten!”

Translation: with thanks to Pastor Ursula Sieg